DePIN 浏览器 - DePIN Scan

项目
代币
类别
社交关注
市值
代币价格
24小时交易量
1天
7天
30天
设备总数
最近7天
Solana's logo
Solana
SOL
Chain
2,793,165
$78,274,626,400
$166.46$5,218,368,017
+2.6%
+5.8%
+11.4%
-
Filecoin's logo
Filecoin
FIL
Server
664,023$2,282,455,645$3.85$188,953,004
-3.3%
-0.7%
+0.0%
3,504
Render's logo
Render
RNDR
ServerAI
201,763$2,087,124,989$5.32$123,302,881
-2.5%
-6.0%
-3.7%
-
Theta's logo
Theta
THETA
ServerAI
270,258$1,340,926,021$1.34$36,383,969
+0.3%
-1.0%
-6.2%
5,885
Helium's logo
Helium
HNT
Wireless
215,159$1,191,933,817$6.96$22,248,591
+2.9%
+5.7%
-3.8%
-
Akash's logo
Akash
AKT
ServerAI
117,646$617,423,951$2.5$9,782,493
-2.4%
-2.5%
-9.2%
472
IoTeX's logo
IoTeX
IOTX
Chain
298,497
$385,236,889
$0.04080$14,261,381
-4.5%
-3.4%
-8.0%
-
io.net's logo
io.net
IO
ComputeAI
501,757$226,316,001$1.88$107,028,894
-3.9%
-9.2%
-6.0%
-
Aethir's logo
Aethir
ATH
Compute
846,018$220,194,186$0.05431$26,159,828
-1.7%
-10.5%
-10.3%
-
Nosana's logo
Nosana
NOS
ComputeAI
51,590$185,002,856$2.22$2,944,439
-7.5%
+29.9%
+2.6%
-
Hivemapper's logo
Hivemapper
HONEY
SensorAI
47,793$163,160,620$0.05950$630,745
+4.8%
+6.3%
-13.5%
8,037
Phoenix's logo
Phoenix
PHB
AICompute
165,122$96,595,691$1.88$15,734,919
-6.2%
-13.3%
+37.3%
1
Arkreen与Roam合作推动可持续区块链解决方案 cover
20 小时前
Arkreen与Roam合作推动可持续区块链解决方案
在区块链和可再生能源领域,Arkreen与去中心化电信先锋Roam达成合作。Roam已在180多个国家发行超过9.18亿个Roam积分,拥有100万注册用户,构建了超过70万个节点的去中心化网络。此次合作是“绿色插头计划”(PGP)的一部分,旨在提升去中心化物理基础设施网络(DePIN)的碳中和。通过将Roam的矿工与Arkreen的智能插头整合,双方实现了电力消费的实时监控,矿工不仅提升了加密货币挖矿能力,还能通过Arkreen的代币化可再生能源证书(REC)抵消碳排放。这一机制鼓励Roam社区成员直接在链上进行碳抵消,增强可持续发展的承诺。Arkreen为Roam提供了能耗监测工具和链上碳抵消机制,推动Roam在去中心化电信领域的领导地位,同时为DePIN社区的全球可持续发展倡议树立了榜样。
亚瑟·海斯在市场波动中收购1.166亿Aethir代币 cover
20 小时前
亚瑟·海斯在市场波动中收购1.166亿Aethir代币
BitMEX创始人亚瑟·海斯近期在加密货币界引发关注,他收购了116.6百万个Aethir(ATH)代币,价值约762万美元,平均价格为每个0.065美元。这一收购发生在他9月清算Pendle($PENDLE)持仓之后,引发对其投资策略和市场前景的讨论。仅在一小时前,海斯转移了4100万个ATH代币,价值约218万美元,其中3600万个转至Bybit交易所,500万个转至OKX,显示出他减少对ATH的敞口,损失约220万美元。尽管如此,他仍持有7560万个ATH代币,价值约416万美元,基于当前市场价损失约122万美元。Aethir作为去中心化实时渲染网络,旨在提升云基础设施和元宇宙内容的可及性。目前该代币市值为2.1亿美元,属于去中心化物理基础设施网络(DePIN)领域。
Flux AI vs MidJourney: The Battle for Artistic Freedom cover
20 小时前
Flux AI vs MidJourney: The Battle for Artistic Freedom
In the evolving landscape of AI-powered art generation, two platforms, Flux AI and MidJourney, have emerged as key players, each with distinct philosophies and functionalities. Flux AI, developed by ex-Stability AI members, champions a censorship-free environment, allowing artists to explore their creativity without restrictions. This open-source platform offers three models—Schnell, Dev, and Pro—catering to various user needs, from quick image generation to high-quality outputs. In contrast, MidJourney is known for its polished visuals but imposes strict content guidelines, limiting the types of images that can be created, particularly those that are violent, explicit, or politically charged. The recent upgrade to MidJourney's v6.1 algorithm has enhanced its image quality and coherence, addressing previous issues like the notorious "weird hand" problem. However, despite these improvements, the platform's stringent censorship policies remain a significant drawback, potentially stifling artistic expression. On the other hand, Flux AI's no-censorship policy empowers creators to tackle complex themes and push artistic boundaries, making it a compelling choice for those seeking creative freedom. The pricing models further highlight the differences, with Flux AI being free for users who run it on their hardware, while MidJourney operates on a subscription basis, starting at $10 per month. Ultimately, the choice between Flux AI and MidJourney boils down to individual priorities. For artists who prioritize convenience and high-quality visuals, MidJourney may be the preferred option. However, for those who value unrestricted creative expression and the ability to explore any subject matter, Flux AI stands out as the clear winner. As the debate over censorship and artistic freedom continues, these platforms represent a broader cultural movement advocating for the right to create without limitations.
Trump Family's Crypto Venture Raises Concerns Amid Political Scrutiny cover
20 小时前
Trump Family's Crypto Venture Raises Concerns Amid Political Scrutiny
Donald Trump’s family-run crypto venture, World Liberty Financial, has recently come under scrutiny following the release of a 13-page document detailing its goals and token allocation. The 'World Liberty Gold Paper' reveals that the Trump family will receive a staggering 22.5 billion non-transferrable governance tokens ($WLFI) and 75% of the net protocol revenues. This allocation raises eyebrows among investors and supporters, as it suggests a potential profit of $337.5 million for the Trump clan, assuming a token price of 1.5 cents. Critics are concerned about the vagueness of the token allocations and the fact that these terms are subject to change, leading to accusations of possible scams. Despite the ambitious goals of World Liberty Financial to challenge traditional banking systems and provide users with more financial freedom, the initial response to the $WLFI token has been tepid. Since its launch, only 917.80 million tokens, worth approximately $137,000, have been sold out of the 20 billion available. This lack of demand indicates that many investors, including Trump supporters, may be skeptical about the platform's sustainability. Furthermore, the Gold Paper explicitly states that neither Trump nor his family holds any legal responsibilities regarding $WLFI or the venture itself, which adds another layer of concern for potential investors. In addition to the controversies surrounding Trump’s crypto project, Vice President Kamala Harris has also faced criticism for her proposed crypto regulations, which appear to focus exclusively on black men. Her announcement has sparked mixed reactions, with some praising her openness to crypto while others argue that her approach is discriminatory. JD Vance, Trump’s potential running mate, has countered Harris's stance, asserting that all individuals, regardless of race, desire the same opportunities in the crypto space. The juxtaposition of these two political figures highlights the ongoing need for equitable regulations in the US crypto market, free from self-serving agendas.